digg Digg  StumbleUpon StumbleUpon  del.icio.us Delicious  Attention, open in a new window. PrintE-mail

More Soldiers Die in Afghanistan than Iraq During June

U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan
photo by Staff Sgt. Vernell Hall, U.S. Army
During June, more than 45 U.S. and Coalition soldiers died in Afghanistan, compared to 31 in Iraq.

DEADLIEST MONTH: The Taliban increased pressure on Coalition forces in Afghanistan in June. For the second straight month, more American and Coalition soldiers died in Afghanistan than in Iraq.

June saw the most fatalities for a single month since the U.S.-led invasion began in 2001. At least 45 coalition troops have died, including 27 Americans, bringing the year's total to 123. If this pace continues, the count for 2008 will surpass last year's 232 deaths.

More NATO Troops Mean More NATO Deaths

Analysts attributed the jump in fatalities to the following:

  • More Troops Deployed—Increased NATO forces to Afghanistan, including the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit from Camp Lejeune, N.C.
  • Troops Along Pakistan Border—Deployment to the southern part of the country near Taliban strongholds along the Pakistan border
  • Taliban Growing—Strengthening of the Taliban in the south during the last six years, because of understaffed NATO forces in that area
  • Weather—Seasonal thawing allows more frequent attacks from Taliban
  • IEDs—Increasing use of roadside bombs
  • Lack of Helicopters—NATO forces don't have enough helicopters to carry out their missions
  • Overwhelmed Afghanis—Inability of the Afghan government to secure the south and deal with the growing heroin trade
  • Apathetic Pakistanis—Lack of pressure from the Pakistan government against militants along its border, letting militants operate without constraint

Recent Southern Afghanistan Conflict Highlights Problem

In June the Taliban attacked a prison in Kandahar, freeing all the prisoners, including several hundred Taliban.

Subsequently, NATO deployed troops to the Kandahar area, driving the Taliban from a number of villages in the Arghandab district.

Marine Lt. Col. Richard Hall, whose forces are pushing into the deserts of Helmand and Farah provinces, said the Taliban have had the opportunity to regroup since 2001.

"We expected we were going to have a lot of friction with the enemy," Hall said. "They have had absolute freedom of movement, freedom of action until our arrival. We're disrupting [Taliban money flow] and they don't like it so they're trying to come after us because of that." (Military.com, 6/30/08)

Pentagon Releases Afghanistan Security Report

The Pentagon released the Report on Progress toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan in late June.

NATO Accomplishments in Afghanistan:

  • A combination of military and nonmilitary resources produced a stable and secure environment in Khowst province, once thought to be ungovernable.
  • An increase in U.S. forces in 2007 helped train and grow the Afghan National Security Forces.
  • The Afghan National Army's professionalism and competence is improving.
  • Significantly disrupting enemy forces in Ghazni province led to the spread of governance.
  • There's a marked improvement in national political efforts, such as the country's constitution and elections.
  • There's considerable growth in the Afghan gross domestic product.

Challenges Facing NATO Forces in Afghanistan:

  • The Afghan National Police isn't improving as quickly as hoped because of corruption and lack of trainers.
  • Taliban have regrouped, showing resiliency.
  • Violence increased in 2007.
  • Taliban attacks switched focus from military personnel to civilians and police.
  • Taliban attacks will probably increase in scope and pace during 2008.
  • Rural governments in south and east face unique challenges.
  • Pressure from the Taliban will grow in northern and western regions of the country.
  • Counter-narcotic efforts have not been successful, and the heroin trade in particular is booming.
  • Afghanistan has a poor human rights record.

Copyright © 2009 Informify

Informify by Email!

Question for Readers:

Where in the Middle East do you think the United States should concentrate its military and economic efforts?

The U.S.-led coalition invaded Afghanistan in 2001 to battle the Taliban. To date, more than 870 coalition soldiers have died.

If you see this text, your browser does not have the Adobe Flash plugin. You can download the plugin at www.adobe.com.

With rising Taliban activity in Afghanistan, the U.S. government might redirect troops there from Iraq-or lose many of the gains made since 2001. This depends, however, on who is president next year.

John McCain (presumptive Republican nominee) says...

  • Focus on Iraq since it's strategically more important to U.S. security than Afghanistan
  • Put permanent military bases in Afghanistan
  • Beef up NATO presence
  • Amplify training for Afghan army and police force

Barack Obama (presumptive Democrat nominee) says...

  • Focus on Afghanistan since it's the more important struggle while Iraq is just a diversion
  • Send up to 10,000 more troops to Afghanistan
  • Put more Special Forces along the Pakistan border
  • Pump up nonmilitary aid by at least $1 billion per year

Story Sources

U.S. Sounds Afghan Alarm (The Wall Street Journal, 6/28/08)

Corps Facing Bloody Afghan Deployment (Military.com, 6/30/08)

June is deadliest month for troops in Afghanistan war (Los Angeles Times, 7/01/08)

Report on Progress toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan [PDF] (U.S. Department of Defense, 6/27/08)

Responses (0)add comment

Write your response below to question above
The administrator has closed this article for responses.

busy
Submit your good news story!
Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Managing Your E-News Subscription  |  Previous Newsletters
Copyright © 2009 Informify. All Rights Reserved.