Bush Threatens to Veto Housing Bill

HOUSING HELP? President Bush has threatened to veto the housing bills that the U.S. House of Representatives proposes. The package the Democrats (and some Republicans) offers has become a political hot potato in an election year that shows a record drop in housing prices. The housing bill debate reflects classic Republican/Democrat differences—less versus more government intervention.
President Bush said that the bill will "reward speculators and lenders." (Reuters, 5/708) Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) disagreed, saying, "American families confronting foreclosure deserve better from the president than a veto threat. They deserve the House's bipartisan housing plan that will protect the American dream of home ownership." (Reuters, 5/7/08)
Bill Offers Mortgage Relief
Rep. Barney Frank (D–Mass.) crafted the package’s main bill, which:
- insures up to $300 billion in mortgage loans
- provides fixed-rate loans
- stipulates that borrowers have to qualify
- makes lenders cut debt to 85% of assessed value in exchange for guarantee on future payments
- insists that borrowers have to give 50% of any future profit from selling or refinancing to the Federal Housing Authority (FHA)
- will cost more than $2.7 billion over the next five years ($1.7 billion of which is paid by taxpayers)
- will help 500,000 borrowers
Companion Bill Offers State Assistance
Rep. Maxine Waters (D–Calif.) offers companion legislation to Frank’s bill, which:
- provides states with $15 billion in loans and grants
- allows states to purchase and rehabilitate foreclosed property
- prevents blight in neighborhoods marked by foreclosures
- overhauls the FHA
- tightens regulation of loan giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
- authorizes state and local housing finance agencies to use tax-exempt bonds to refinance mortgages.
Putting this in perspective, remember that $15 billion is only half of what it cost the government to rescue investment bank Bear Stearns last March.
Copyright © 2009 Informify
Sources
"White House threatens veto of FHA-rescue bill" (CNNMoney.com)
"House set to pass sweeping housing rescue bill " (Reuters)
"Housing aid bills face vetoes by President Bush " (AP)
"Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae " (Marketplace)
"Bush faults Democrats on housing crisis, energy and taxes" (AP)
Question for Readers:
Do you think this bill will make taxpayers pay for those who really need help, or reward those who have been irresponsible?
Members of both sides of the House are struggling to find solutions for the economy’s problems, which have been fueled by the subprime mortgage crisis (not to mention rising energy costs).
Why would Bush veto a plan that offers some relief?
According to Jaret Seiberg, senior vice president at the Stanford Group, a Washington policy research firm, the threat is a political maneuver to pressure the Democrats. “We see this more as an effort to gain leverage over the final shape of the bill and less about an actual veto,” Seiberg said. “The politics of killing this bill are negative for the Republicans, who very much need to win either Ohio or Florida if they hope to keep the White House in November. Both of those states are suffering severely during the housing mess." (CNNMoney.com, 5/7/08)
Today's Other Stories
- First War Crimes’ Trial in 60 Years Begins, Guantanamo Detainee ‘Test’ Case
- EPA Releases Warnings, Proposed Regulations for Climate Change
- Congress’ Override of Medicare Veto Changes More than Doctor Pay Cuts
- FDA Clears Tomatoes of Salmonella, Now Suspects Chili Peppers
- Lobbyist Videotaped Trading Political Access for Donations to Bush Library










